We may only be halfway through 2021, but it is already shaping up to be a breakthrough year for carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) to emerge as a viable tool for upstream companies to decarbonise operations.
Although the concept has been around for decades, CCS is moving into the mainstream. All the industry’s largest companies now plan to use sequestration to help them reach their decarbonisation targets.
However, Angus Rodger, from the Asia Pacific upstream research team at Wood Mackenzie, a Verisk company (Nasdaq: VRSK), said: “We believe the regulatory, commercial, and technical hurdles still to be overcome are significantly underestimated. Discussions with both existing and aspirational CCS operators convey a clear message: hitting targets will be very challenging.”
The oil and gas industry has been experimenting with CCS as a way of dealing with unwanted carbon emissions for decades. Even so, it has barely managed to put a dent in the problem.
Rodger said: “In 2019, the world emitted around 33 gigatonnes (Gt) of CO2, but current CCS projects are capturing just 40 million tonnes (Mt) of CO2 annually. If we are to hit global decarbonisation goals, this will have to rise to at least 7,000 MtCO2 per year by 2050. That’s a huge challenge.
“Changes are afoot, however. The number of planned carbon sequestration projects has ballooned in the last few years, from around 50 in 2019 to nearly 300 today. It is a huge growth opportunity for the upstream sector that utilises existing skill sets and infrastructure.”
This year has been a landmark for CCS, seeing it move from the fringes to the main stage. Three of the largest gas projects approved so far in 2021 – Barossa (Australia), North Field East (Qatar) and Ghasha (UAE) – all have high CO2 content and come with associated CCS or carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) plans to capture and/or offset it.
The energy transition means the upstream industry can’t ignore the challenges of carbon-intensive fields; operators must take tangible steps to offset their carbon footprint.
One of the biggest problems facing the growth of CCS is the lack of relevant legislation and regulation.
Rodger said: “We believe companies and investors continue to underestimate the regulatory, commercial and technical hurdles they have yet to overcome.
“Current and aspiring CCS operators know that hitting targets will be very challenging. Many admit in private that they are at the start of a steep learning curve and lack certainty as to their ability to execute in the absence of relevant legislation.
“Even so, establishing a footprint is strategically important, especially as companies hope to turn CCS into a future source of cash flow.”
He added that there are many CCS investment drivers.
“For some companies, it is an environmental, social and governance (ESG) issue, so it’s a natural step to decarbonise their upstream operations and increase sustainability,” he said. “For others, it is a huge business opportunity, albeit one that still requires a commercial, cash flow-driven model.”
For CCS to scale up beyond demonstration projects, it must be driven by commercial imperatives.
Rodger said CCS projects – in particular, collaborative CCS projects – are an essential part of upstream’s future in a lower-carbon world.
“Decarbonising upstream is crucial as ESG risks expand. CCS can prolong asset lives, maintain investability and help capture price premia. Carbon pricing will expedite these factors. Cleaner molecules extend longevity under all scenarios. And for the most ambitious companies, it can help provide material solutions to Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions.”
He added: “The industry can’t do it alone, however, and company targets will not be met if the right carbon pricing, credits, incentives, legislation and regulation are not in place.
“One of the biggest problems facing the growth of CCS is the lack of relevant legislation and regulation. A gulf is also growing between the OECD countries with ambitious decarbonisation goals that are starting to actively facilitate CCS projects and the rest of the world.”
Such facilitation takes two key forms: CCS regulation and government funding. CCS projects require government policy and support to proceed.
However, most countries lack the requisite legal and fiscal legislation framework on sequestration, licensing, carbon accreditation, incentives and ultimate liability for leakage risk. This is putting the brakes on operators keen to implement CCS in countries such as Indonesia, Russia and Australia, Rodger said.
“The lack of a clear economic incentive for CCS means that virtually all projects in operation today have required significant levels of government support. Public funding is helpful and necessary – as it was in the early days of wind and solar – but for CCS to scale up beyond demonstration projects, it must be driven by commercial imperatives,” he added.
“The future direction of carbon pricing will be crucial. Every company looking at CCS is wrestling with the commercial piece of the puzzle. The scale and uncertainty of the costs is significant. And with so few projects developed in recent years, benchmarks are few and far between.
“For the time being, then, CSS remains a cost, but as carbon prices rise, that will change. Early movers may gain a valuable strategic advantage, but it won’t be easy.”